🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, however, may align so closely with the carefully constructed version circulated by official channels that, domestically, it reads as a compliment instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a tailor-made persona of the president. This figure is a political superhero devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series released last October, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “save” the nation from disorder. While the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this identical story rather than undercutting it. A new film inspired by a popular book aims to subvert the Putin cult by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, none of this ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged Putin to accept the role. The position was in essence a selection process with many candidates. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the state in practice.

• His list included several politicians, including a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per a journalist who studied his rise, the chosen candidate simply fitted the necessary criteria: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the process said the key criterion was controllability and loyalty, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his “recruitment work” in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Interestingly, the shift to depicting him as a “007” may in part have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. His harder version prompted Russian media and online audiences to draw visual parallels with Putin. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a small victory. Its exclusion of public dissent, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. His influence is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the exact legends it might seek to examine.